Yes, after all if there is no such self in the first place,
IN MY VIEW this is the worst horse manure spiritual people have ever come up with... while the self you may know may not be your true self, to say that no self exists is just plain stupid.... if there were no selves,then you would not be discussing this with me.
often overlooked in buddhism, the buddha said there is no self, but he also said there is no no self either.... and my understanding is that we are like a dreamer who has never known a waking life, the only things we do know are our own minds inventions, symbols, dreams... so anything we know of our self is not our real and true self...only the symbol of it... and the accuracy of the symbol to the reality is not testable. The fact that you experience and feel and care is more than sufficient to show you have a true self.... but not one that you can know any true nature about.
any effort to erase anything is only coming from a confused idea about self, the spiritual seeker is created and then trying to get rid of self, whereas that created identity is the false self. The true teachers are not trying to get followers for themselves, they are essentially turning away confused seekers by trying to get them to see they have misunderstood all along, or turning them to their true self-nature if you will. There is nothing wrong with a sense of self, you just become confused when you believe in that sense as a solid entity.this is the core of the con... the religious mystic has had some experience and a belief about that expeirence and is now passing it off as KNOWLEDGE...and because he is CONfident about it, others tend to admire him and accept his pronouncements even if they violate anything that has ever made sense.... The true teacher is one who can show you that you never needed him, a false teacher ensnares people like a shepherd ensnares sheep...making them feel comfortable while doing them overall violence in the end.